Mrs. Salamanka

A poem by Noon Meem Rashid (Urdu), posting here specially for Faiza Sultan Khan, with a promise to post it in Persian transcript soon!

Noon Meem Rashid

Noon Meem Rashid

Khuda hashr mein ho madadgaar mera

Ke dekhi hein mein ne Mrs. Salamanka ki aankhein

Mrs. Salamanka ki ankhein

Ke jin ke ufaq hein janoobi samunder ki neeli rasaa’i se aagay

Janoobi samandur ki neeli rasaa’i

Ke jis ke jazeeray hajoom-e-sahar se darakhshaan

Darakhshaan jazeeron mein zartaab-o-annaab-o-qurmuz parindon ki jaulaan gahein

Aisay phaili hoi jesay jannat ke daamaan

Parinday azal aura bad ke mah-o-saal mein baan afshaan!

Khuda hashr mein ho madadgaar mera

Ke mein ne liye hein Mrs. Salamanka ke honton ke bosay

Who bosay ke jin ki halaawat ke chashmay

Shimaali zameenon ke zartaab-o-annaab-o-qurmuz darakhton

Ke madhosh baaghon se aagay

Jahaan zindagi ke raseeda shagoofon ke seenon

Se khwaabon ke rum deed azan-boor letay hein ras aur peetay hein who

Ke jis ke nashay ki jilaa se

Zamaanon ki naa-deeda mehraab ke do kinaaron ke neechay

Hein yak-baargi goonj uth-tay khalaa-o-malaa ke jalaa-jal

Jalaa-jal ke naghmay baham aisay pevast hotay hein jesay

Mrs. Salamanka ke lab meray lab se!

Khuda hashr mein ho madadgar mera

Ke dekha hay mein ne

Mrs. Salamanka ko bister mein shab bher barahna

Woh garden, woh baanhein, woh raanein, woh pistaan

Ke jin mein janoobi samunder ki lehron ke toofaan

Shimaali darakhton ke baaghon ke phoolon ki khushbu

Jahaan dam-ba-dam itr-o-toofaan baham aur gurezaan

Mrs. Salamanka ka jism-e-barahna

Ufaq ta ufaq jesay angoor ki bail jis ki

Ghizaa aasmaanon ka noor aur haasil

Woh lazzat ke jis ka nahin koi paayaan

Khuda ke siwaa kaun hay paak damaan!

Civil Society Gravely Concerned at Tuesday Turn of Events

Islamabad, 15 January 2013

We, the concerned citizens, human rights activists and civil society organizations, are watching with the gravest concern the fast-unfolding events in Islamabad today.

It is the first time that a democratic dispensation was nearing its natural completion.

We condemn the exploitation and the use of women and children as human shields in the expensive drama being staged by the Canadian parachute Tahir-ul-Qadri.  It turned into farcical melodrama when the Supreme Court’s order to arrest the Prime Minister of Pakistan and 16 others re: the rental power case was announced in the middle of his speech being relayed live on Tuesday afternoon.  The well-trained emissary lost not a moment in making the linkage between his unConstitutional demands, incitement to treason and emotional blackmail with the SC’s order, terming it 50% success of his “million man (sic) long march” within 12 hours of the Islamabad sit-in.  We condemn this in the strongest terms.

Likewise, without going into its merits at all, we express, with due respect, our gravest concern at the curiously bad timing of the Honourable Supreme Court judgement/short order in the rental power case, which has been ongoing for months and months now.  We were hoping for and fully expecting the SC to take suo moto notice AGAINST Qadri’s unConstitutional stand and actions, instead of the OPPOSITE, which has wittingly or unwittingly made an unworthy hero out of Qadri.  It is inexplicably strange that Islamabad, the besieged capital, and Pakistan, a country in extreme crisis, had to witness this double whammy today. But perhaps it is not so strange and not a coincidence either.

We firstly wish to request the Honourable Supreme Court, with the utmost respect, to take all possible measures NOT to derail the democratic dispensation at this extremely critical juncture, no matter how flawed and non-performing its governance has been – which we decry and have been pointing out continuously over the last 5 years.

We demand that Qadri come out of the closet and inform Pakistanis of his mentors, whether stationed in Ottawa, MI5/London, Langley/Virginia, or indeed not too far away in Rawalpindi, or closer still, in Aabpara/Islamabad.  We warn him in the sternest language not to exploit the masses in the name of religion or poverty or basic needs.

We urgently demand that the federal Government, all the provincial Governments and all political parties immediately make a consensus statement regarding the election schedule, and their utmost resolve to uphold democracy and democratic norms.

We warn the armed forces of Pakistan NOT to stage either a direct or indirect coup d’etat, by either marching boots down Constitution Avenue, or by installing their proxy, whether in the form of Qadri or Khan or any retired general – or ANYONE.  The new Pakistan may not yet be at Tahrir Square, but we are not too far behind.  We are very closely monitoring the unfolding situation and we will not allow Jinnah’s Pakistan to be hijacked or derailed.  We are alive and we are alert.

Endorsed by:

Human rights activists, citizens:

  1. Tahira Abdullah
  2. Marvi Sirmed
  3. Samar Minallah
  4. Dr. Rakhshanda Perveen
  5. Ambreen Ahmad
  6. Naseer Memon
  7. Sirmed Manzoor
  8. Saleem Malik

Organizations:

  1. Ethnomedia
  2. SACHET
  3. Creative Anger
  4. WAF
  5. PRHN
  6. PODA
  7. Aurat Foundation
  8. Bedari
  9. WORD
  10. Rozan
  11. Khyber Pakhtunlhwa Civil Society Network
  12. Amn Tehreek
  13. SDPI

 

Accountability of the Prime Accountability Institution: Parliament

With its triangular function of legislation, representation and oversight on the Executive Branch of the state, Parliament is normally considered to be the prime democratic institution to hold the governments and state institutions accountable, as well as articulate concerns on corrupt practices on behalf of citizens. In recent times, the same concern has been voiced about the parliaments, especially in South Asian societies. The integrity and accountability of parliament is as important as is that of the Executive Branch. General perception is that the accountability of parliament is ensured through the elections. But considering the long stretch of time between two elections, this seems insufficient mechanism of accountability. It is, this, incorporated within the constitutions and in rules of Business of the parliaments, whereby they (parliaments) present themselves for accountability. It was importance of this emerging concern that pressed me to explore the integrity & accountability mechanisms for the parliament, ingrained in Pakistan’s constitution and the Rules.

Following presentation was given on the request of Ms. Hina Jilani, Chair of South Asians for Human Rights (SAHR), to one of their conferences in late August this year. I thought to post it here for the benefit of students of political science and the posterity. Hope you find this useful. Your feedback would be warmly welcomed and appreciated.

Marvi Sirmed

Supreme Court and Public Accounts Committee

Sharing with you this important document, which has left me shocked and extremely disappointed in the ‘wisdom’ of those who need to be the wisest. Amid all kinds of corruption allegations on politicians being pursued by the Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCOP), one case got special treatment by the worthiest men of of this country – the graft case of Mr. Arsalan Iftikhar. Iftikhar is a 34 years old ‘innocent boy’ who was reportedly ‘lured’ into accepting a not-s-small sum of money from one Malik Riaz, the real estate tycoon who knows how to make the mare go. The innocence of Mr. Iftikhar is further proven by the fact that he happens to be the son of Chief Justice of Pakistan. The case was thus, taken up by none other than CJP himself, as a suo-moto action under Section 184(3) which allows the CJP to move the court if the case pertains to violation of fundamental rights and is of public interest. The case, definitely is of public interest and violates Mr. Iftikhar’s right to remain innocent for the rest of his life! The case, as was right thing to do, was disposed of by mildly lecturing all parties to ‘behave’.

Why is it important to recall Mr. Iftikhar? Because his was not the only case where the worthy court to be partisan for its own interest. Responding to Public Accounts Committee, the elected watch body over the Auditor General of Pakistan that called Registrar of Supreme Court to present himself before the Committee and explained some overspending by the SCOP. Guess what happens next? The wise men in SCOP, came up with a document that conveniently leaves everyone in the SCOP outside the ambit of any elected watch body that oversees the transparency of financial transaction by public institutions including SCOP. Have a lok over how the Registrar of SCOP – an official who is not a judge – exonerates himself from legislature’s scrutiny.

One wonders who is going to ensure transparency when even the most responsible institutions of this country try to evade law on the pretext of law. Ironic and sad. The language used in this document and disregard for transparency makes my wish it must not be what the worthy men in SCOP meant. Have a good reading experience please!
Supreme Court, Pakistan, Chief Justice, Arsalan Iftikhar, Auditor General, Public Accounts Committee, Parliament, Judiciary, Pakistan

 

 

‘On Compromise’ by John Morley that Jinnah suggested for reading

 

Below is the text of famous writing, On Compromise, by Lord John Morley of UK. I just found it in my collection of pdf documents gathered from various online & offline sources. Thought it is important to share it with today’s young of this country, whose founder Mohammad Ali Jinnah once prescribed this reading to the youth of his era. Jinnah was great admirer of Lord Morley, who, besides being a liberal intellectual & statesman, was a literary writer as well. His writings on Burke, Byron etc. He was an anti-imperialist, but advocated fierce tackling of native resistance against the state in India, which he called conspiracy and sedition.

Morley became Secretary of State to India in 1906 and made an important contribution to Indian politics by introducing his reforms of 1909, commonly known as Minto-Morley reforms. Because of his continuous efforts, British India got some share of Indian nationals (the rich ones) in the decision making. After Minto-Morley reforms of 1909, the Legislative Council of India got two seats for Indians, for the first time. Jinnah got benefitted by getting elected to one of these seats in 1910. But Jinnah’s appreciation of Lord Morley can’t be attributed to his election. It goes back to late 19th century when Jinnah was in UK and had the opportunity to listen to thinkers like Morley and his hero William Gladstone.

At one occasion during his active political life, Jinnah advised the youngsters of the time to read the works of Morley, especially the below posted On Compromise. Hope it proves interesting reading for today’s youth, especially the passionate and ‘all-knowing’ youngsters from Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf. I hope Imran Khan also reads it. Reading is what all of us desperately need.

Discrediting an Activist

bomb chair

This is based on my short article that appeared in Express Tribune on June 19, 2012.

Blue-Mikes2

Marvi Sirmed while addressing a Press Conference in Islamabad

We in Pakistan are wonderful people. We are righteous enough to hate on the corrupt and chaste enough to impulsively condemn the corrupt when ‘exposed’, mostly without verifying the facts. But we almost always forget to bring in judicial process before maligning anyone.  Our collective disregard for due process of justice has made things easier for the forces of oppression. Now they don’t have to murder, they just have to discredit voices of dissent through cyber bullies. Just a random figure, an account number with real name of a bank and you are all set to kill anyone with a graft accusation. No further question will be asked to substantiate the claim.

It happened so amid the hubbub of recent scandal involving the son of Chief Justice of Pakistan and the chief corrupter of the virtuous, the real estate tycoon Riaz Malik. We somehow landed in a debate about the corruption of media persons, especially the TV talk show anchors. That, one believes, is a very important issue, on which this scribe has written so many times. My readers would bear me out as one of the biggest critics of a section of media that has assigned itself the role of mediator, power broker, advocate, judge, and executor – just anything but journalist.

There appeared a list of journalists last week from anonymous source. The list bore the names of journalists and the amount of money and other moveable and immoveable assets alleged to have been bribed by Malik Riaz to them. It soon was rubbished as an attempt to malign senior media persons. After this, Imran Khan, leader of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf, demanded inquiry into the media people who have been bribed by Malik Riaz. Impressive statement. Who would not want to get the black sheep in media exposed? Next day, a YouTube video erupted displaying another list of 19 journalists and TV anchors on a supposed Behria Town letterhead. Originator remained anonymous.

This ‘updated’ list bore credible names from media alongside another odd name. Mine. Not a journalist by profession, not a TV anchor, I was shocked to see myself in that league. A professional in the field of democratic governance and an activist for human rights in my voluntary capacity, I could not understand why I was put under the rubric of ‘journalists and anchors’. The list claimed transfer of Rs. 1 million through bank transfer from “NIBC [SIC] Bank Limited (Behria Town Branch)”. To add meat, an account number was also given – # 8283982-5. No one bothered to confirm if the account belongs to me. Everyone who forwarded the list charitably on the Internet forgot to ask another basic question, why would a real estate tycoon invest his money in a human rights campaigner?

Neither this account number belongs to me, nor have I ever had an account in NIB Bank. In fact, the account number, according to the website of Behria Orchard, belongs to Behria Town itself, that too, for transactions in US Dollars. I own no moveable or immovable assets except a modest car, a laptop and appliances at home. My only, and most precious, priceless assets are my daughter and two-decades long history of struggle for the rights of people of Pakistan. I have two bank accounts, one of which is the salary account; the other one is a saving account that I used to keep aside small savings for my daughter’s education. None of these accounts are in NIB. We live in a rented house. Both of us husband and wife struggle hard to make both ends meet, which we manage to do quite well. We occasionally invite friends to our place and laugh the nights away. Both of us come from middle class educated families who don’t own any assets either. My mother in law lives in a small home in Lahore, which she managed to build in 1998 after a life time of savings. My parents still live in a rented house for they had to sell their only saving, a 10 Marla plot, for my wedding. But all of us live a very happy, satisfied and comfortable life without these worldly assets. My parents and parents in law are proud of us for our hard work and struggle.

Let me clearly declare here, all my financial details will be available to judicial procedure if and whenever it would require. Since we believe only on rhetoric of independent judiciary with no respect for the court and its procedure, we might not require any judicial procedure before making our judgments. My tax returns, any assets that my family owns, will be declared but on a condition. My demands are two. One; the author of the list must come forward and declare that s/he made the list. The author must come forward with the funds transfer details, the bankl statement of the account number given in the fake list, the evidence that the funds were indeed transferred to my account or any of my family members’ accounts. Two; we must be given satisfactory answers to how did Malik Riaz remain scot free for so many years after corrupting almost every state institution in this country. And how did Mr. Arsalan Iftikhar amass a wealth worth Rs 900 million in just four years? You do it and I will declare everything my family and I own. Although I’ve amply declared already what I have. I promise to declare everything in the court of law, with documentary evidence to prove my case if my conditions are met.

The fact that I have to explain all this is painful indeed. I had thought my passion to work for the betterment of my country is greater than any worldly goal especially the rat race for money. Never in these two decades, in any of the campaigns that I contributed to, did I ever care for my life, my existence. It was always at stakes. Once Shaheed Salmaan Taseer sent me a message asking to be careful and stay safe, for the causes I was choosing were in his opinion too dangerous for a lady in a radicalized society like Pakistan. He encouraged me for what I was doing, but at the same time, did not like too much of selflessness. Ironically, he succumbed to same radicalized mindset he always wanted me to beware of.

Never had I imagined I could be subjected to such a malign campaign, forgetting what I had put at stake. I was threatened for life openly, for gang rape, for acid throwing, for kidnap. I was abused nakedly on social media by cyber bullies who did not even spare my family. My daughter, then 11 years old, was bullied and abused, just because her mother had a different idea for Pakistani society. Even an average mind would have asked, was that all for money? Could that be for an amount as meager as Rs 1 million? Would you put your life in danger for even Rs 1 billion?

In a state of utter shock and under the feeling of extreme humiliation, I tried to contact Behria Town management to seek their explanation of that fake list. On calling Behria Town management, I happened to speak to Malik Riaz’s Personal Secretary who categorically rejected the list adding that the letterhead was forged too.

The important question remains, who could target a person with clear stand on difficult issues be it rights of Ahmadis, Hazara Shias, Hindus, Christians, the Baloch, missing persons, against discriminatory laws, rights of women, children and labourers, even the most controversial, LGBT rights. Not to forget my extensive writing against political role of Pakistan’s military establishment, against extremists, terrorists, against the propagated narrative by Imran Khan, on Pakistan’s Afghan policy, on counter-terrorism and for peace with India. I wonder where have I ever faltered in my consistency on these causes? Just try to think what among all these causes, would be sponsored by a real estate don? I might be an opinion maker, I might have been a free lance columnist, but what exactly did I write, which suited Malik Riaz? Till few days ago, I was alleged to be a R&AW agent. A MOSAD and CIA agent. And now I’m being accused of accepting money from a tycoon in bed with military establishment, on whose pay role are none other than retired generals. Can something be more insulting to average intelligence?

Taking a look at my record, it is not much difficult what forces would target me. The disturbing fact is that the list was forwarded mainly from PTI supporters. It would be, however, unfair to mention Mr. Simon Samson Sharaf from PTI who specially called me to express solidarity. ‘You have been putting your life in danger by standing up against extremism in a radicalized society. It is but understood that the list is fake and you were unfairly targeted’, said Mr. Sharaf.

Attacking my integrity has killed a part of me – my enthusiasm to change the society for better. Instead of doing this, you should have pumped bullets in me like you did with Shaheed Salmaan Taseer. Little hope could be attached to a society that disparages voices of dissent like this. May be, the history will judge me better. Tomorrow, if not today.